Image by herzogbr via Flickr
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Heinberg: Our evanescent culture and the awesome duty of librarians
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Great Sightline post on planning for aging
Image by Transguyjay via Flickr
Boom Towns
These issues came to life for me several years ago, when my father, a California school teacher, started looking for his future retirement home in Oregon's Willamette Valley. His criteria for the move, "I want to get away from the crowded [city] and find a place that is less hectic…somewhere I can grow things." At the time, I was co-teaching a class on housing and environments for older adults at Portland State University's Institute on Aging. Every ounce of my professional training told me that his moving away from important services could become an issue for both of us. I also knew my father well: he had never grown anything in his life. So I suggested, as gently as I could, that he might want to reconsider moving away from services he'd need.
He didn't buy it.
My father simply couldn't fathom the changes that age would bring to his abilities or his faculties. Even though he has never wanted to burden anyone, it was tough for him to envision the kind of decline that would lead to needing help with driving, shopping — or growing things. . . .
My father, like many others, had trouble facing the realities that accompany normal aging, not to mention the changes that might accompany a serious illness. Yet he was fully capable of making wise decisions when it pertained to someone else. . . .
Unfortunately, not everyone has learned those lessons—and the vital window of opportunity for planning for a rapidly aging population is closing. To help prepare, here are three things we can all start thinking about.
First, accept that you are aging. . . . Second, developers, planners, and homebuyers can break away from the "Peter Pan" style of development, which assumes we'll never grow old. . . . . "Visitable/visit-able" housing design can and should be incorporated into as much new and redeveloped housing as possible. . . . Finally, we can foster innovation in housing design and development. Concepts such as co-housing and the Green House model merit further exploration; these opportunities need to be expanded to be available to those with limited and fixed incomes. . . .
UPDATE: Must be the change of seasons making several bloggers write about this issue. Sharon Astyk has a great post on aging during the Era of Limits.
Note how well hens integrate into small-lot intensive farming
Two of the terrifying urban hens, caught on film. Image via Wikipedia
Underneath the arbor, a wooden box sways in the wind, acting as nest for the family's Mason bees.(Note that the roosters are unnecessary for egg production, so there's no need for them in urban/suburban settings.)The bees are good for the garden, Kim said. They pollinate the plants and are safe for the kids.
"They don't sting because there is no honey to protect," Kim said.
Dan built a hive for them out of a wooden block, drilled with holes that recess about four inches.
"(The female) fills it up with eggs, goes away and dies, and her little batch is born," Kim said.
Her other garden helpers are the 15 hens and three roosters who share the backyard.
"They are a major component of my gardening," Kim said. "We have one we call the gardener. As soon as you start digging in the soil, she will come to eat all the bugs."
The birds' insect-munching expertise comes in handy when Kim prepares a bed for replanting.
"I let them go and do whatever they want to do," she said. "When they're done, they move off and I plant my stuff and block them off."
She lets the fowl run loose in the yard every few days. They help to fertilize the grass and, in return, the hens lay roughly a dozen eggs a day. The yolks are a bright yellow and orange happy eggs from happy chickens, she added, with a smile and she sells the excess for $2 a dozen.
Don't mind all the unnecessary deaths!
How the US Stacks Up on Preventable Deaths
1. France -- 65
2. Japan -- 71
3. Australia -- 71
4. Spain -- 74
5. Italy -- 74
6. Canada -- 77
7. Norway -- 80
8. Netherlands -- 82
9. Sweden -- 82
10. Greece --84
11. Austria -- 84
12. Germany -- 90
13. Finland -- 93
14. New Zealand -- 96
15. Denmark -- 101
16. UK -- 103
17. Ireland --103
18. Portugal --104
19. US -- 110
The U.S. ranks at the bottom of 19 industrialized nations in the number of preventable deaths by conditions such as diabetes, epilepsy, stroke, influenza, ulcers, pneumonia, infant mortality and appendicitis. The number at the right represents the number of preventable deaths per 100,000 population in each country in 2002-2003.
Source: Commonwealth Fund, Health Affairs, World Health Organization
More Word
Image by OakleyOriginals via Flickr
How serious is the world's situation? Bad enough, says a leading Australian scientist, that the world will have to produce more food in the next 50 years than we have in the thousands of years since civilization began, and will have a tough time keeping up.If you don't immediately understand what she's talking about, the all-time great introduction to this is here -- about an hour.There have been dark predictions --mostly wrong -- of worldwide food shortages before.
But this one comes from Megan Clark, the head of Australia's national science agency, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, or CSIRO. Clark is hardly a wild-eyed extremist; she is a former mining executive.
In a speech in Canberra last week, Clark said growing population will cause exponentially-rising demand, and a warming climate will make the challenge more difficult.
"It is hard for me to comprehend that in the next 50 years we will need to produce as much food as has been consumed over our entire human history," she said.
"That means in the working life of my children, more grain than ever produced since the Egyptians, more fish than eaten to date, more milk than from all the cows that have ever been milked on every frosty morning humankind has ever known." …
Word
Funny, if economagical thinking had any relevance in the real world, there would have been oceans of oil available at $150/barrel. Image via Wikipedia
From an ASPO interview with Jeremy Leggett:
Leggett: I think it’s entirely appropriate for the entire economics community, with the notable exception of the very few economists who saw the financial crash coming, to go back to the drawing board. I mean they got that whole thing catastrophically, systemically wrong. And I was shocked but pleased to see on British television news the other night the head of the economics faculty at the University of Chicago saying, when asked, what are the implications of the financial crash? He said, we have to go right back to the drawing board, I’m paraphrasing, but he was as strong in his wording as this. “We got everything wrong at a systemic level. We should be full of humility and by golly we’re going to do it. Our whole discipline has been has been on flawed assumptions.” And that’s what they have to break.
We hear this from the economists now about peak oil: that the price mechanism works, that simply when oil prices go up, they’ll go out and they’ll find more oil; it’s there under the ground isn’t it? Economics will find the oil. Wrong, wrong, wrong. And we know this. But they have to take some of the humility that is absolutely required of them as a result of the financial crisis and bring it to a re-examination of what they’re saying about peak oil.
Monday, October 5, 2009
Bankrupting ourselves . . . for "safety!"
Salem's biggest boom industry. Image by Katherine H via Flickr
We're unique among nations in having a trifecta of penal senselessness: We have not only extraordinarily long sentences for an extraordinary wide range of crimes (sentences that typically obliterate family ties and destroy childrens' prospects), we have a huge political class of hypocrites who have an extraordinary level of commitment to a senseless and futile drug war (treating addictions through prisons rather than through the medical model); lastly, we've also got a criminal justice system built on a vengeance/retribution model that ensures that, with almost 100% success, the people ground through the system are eventually returned to society with no skills, no hope, no supports, and no prospects for making a living through anything but crime.
It's really a perfect storm of counterproductive policies because, when you look at the incentives available for the various players (cops, prosecutors, legislators, prison staffers, voters), they all tend to perpetuate the status quo, even though the end result is to move us further and further into bankruptcy while we build and fill prisons, the only really vibrant industrial sector we have right now. Prisons are "anti-factories," giant facilities engaged in the round-the-clock task of destroying human potential and ensuring a steady customer base for themselves for decades to come.
The prison mania is one of the dead weights that's causing our economy to fail; even the richest countries eventually find that there's a limit to how much wealth you can sink into anti-factories before the wealth runs out.
Unfortunate Counterscheduling
The Grand Theater entrance is on the right, under the arched awning, just south of Grand Vines wineshop/cafe. Image via Wikipedia
I know that a civic-minded bunch like yourselves probably has scads of members who have attended one or more of the Salem Progressive Film Series showings over the last three years. Which are always on the second Thursday of the month at 7 p.m. at the Grand Theater on High Street (at Court St).
So . . . what's up with the counter-scheduling of the health care forum and films this month at the same time as the SPFS is holding the LNG movie showing and discussion? Was this intentional or a serious oversight? Given that SPFS events are set months in advance, is it too late for you to reschedule yours?
You're not doing Salem any favors by making people choose between these.
Salem needs RSS feeds on all city web pages
An RSS feed is a tool for dramatically improved citizen information and participation (for free!) because it means that every time the destination page has new content, everyone who cares about that page will automatically be informed. In other words, citizens don't have to keep checking a website only to find that nothing has changed (which discourages people from checking, which means they miss things that eventually are posted).
I spoke to Chuck Bennett about this just this morning -- given how difficult these are to get going, I should hope that we could have all of the City of Salem's pages offering RSS feeds by the end of the week (it really is that easy).
And feel free to notice the RSS link on this blog, and to click on it to subscribe to the feed for new posts here. The more people we have in Salem who use this smart idea, the more likely that it will eventually penetrate into the City of Salem site.
P.S. If you don't know why an RSS feed is so useful and how much a difference it makes, watch this short "RSS in Plain English" video: