Tuesday, May 12, 2009
Stop unwanted phonebook dumping! Save a forest or two . . .
US public health institutions start pondering peak oil
Insights pertaining to the public health implications of peak oil
became the focus for the remainder of the day. . . .* Awareness: The public health community has barely begun to address peak oil; ignorance of the problem is today's norm; the health system takes for granted long-term resource availability, and has made minimal preparation for disruptions in supply.
* Scope: Peak oil has the potential to significantly disrupt each of the three essential pillars of sustainable well-being—economic, sociopolitical, and environmental
* Disruption Potential: Peak oil will have its public health impacts in the United States on a medical care system that is natural resource-intensive, cost-intensive, and neither encourages nor supports saving resources; peak oil will intensify known public health hazards, create new hazards, and impact the entire public health preparedness system.
* Regional Vulnerability: Especially in rural regions, delivery of health care is highly dependent on private vehicle transport to get health care providers to their centralized locations, to bring critically ill patients to service facilities, and to meet the clinical care and outpatient needs of widely dispersed populations.
* Trend: Public health services in the United States have already experienced increasing demands coupled with decreasing ability to meet them; fewer people can afford private health insurance; most officials surveyed expect further funding cuts ahead.
* Sector-specificity: The public health system is highly vulnerable because of its deep dependence upon oil for transport of patients and providers, for the disposable plastic supplies which are the foundation of modern antiseptic hygiene, as well as for energy-intensive hospital operations and for pharmaceutical feedstock.
* Limited Mitigation Options: Public health planners can undertake scenario planning, and set up hospital-level committees to make decisions about scarce medical supply allocations
* Scarce-resource Allocation: Peak oil can be expected increase the duration and severity of disaster events, and of post-event responses; public health officials are accustomed to planning for the allocation of scarce resources during emergencies, but have not yet factored peak oil into such planning.
* Triage: Peak oil disaster preparedness is inadequate or non-existent; there is a significant risk of a mental health "surge" overwhelming the minimal surplus capacity of hospital emergency departments; it is crucial that allocation of finite petroleum- based healthcare be perceived as fair to preserve trust and adherence to other policies (e.g., quarantines).
The series of conclusions above paints a picture of a nation under-prepared for the impact that peak oil will have on health. As Brian Schwartz of the Bloomberg School concluded, "It is probably now too late to mitigate all the threats." Yet the conference also provided grounds for encouragement. There was broad agreement, for example, with the CDC's Jeremy Hess that "Public health workers have a responsibility to let people know that peak oil is a very real and imminent public health issue." Peak oil education, he argued, must become part of the job of insuring public health. As this happens, the field's professionals will draw on their experience in framing threats
to health care in ways that reach the public effectively. They will also call on their expertise in allocating scarce resources through procedures that people can perceive as fair and transparent, and therefore oriented towards maintaining public trust and social cohesion. As Bloomberg's Stuart Chaitkin suggested, "What is needed is a global energy revolution with three platform planks: end denial; change behavior (retrofit, travel less, eat low on the food chain, develop a preventative healthcare system); and plan for likely shortages."
A Honey of an Idea
It is impossible to overstate the importance of pollinators like honeybees to humans
No pollinators = no food.
Simple as that.
Great news not so great after all -- staff proposes to make hens for the elites only
That's why it's so disconcerting to find how the proposed ordinance to allow some urban hens in Salem has been disfigured by the staff recommendation:
The city staff has recommended that chickens be allowed only on single-family residential lots larger than 10,000 square feet, or about 0.23 acres. No roosters would be allowed, and coops would have to be kept in back and side yards at least 20 feet from the property line.In other words, in the close-in neighborhoods where hens were kept for decades without a problem, few homeowners will be allowed to have hens, because of the arbitrary lot-size and setback restriction. Thus, under this proposal, high-income McMansion owners in Sprawlville sections of South and West Salem will all be allowed to have hens, but many people in modest, working-class neighborhoods of NE Salem will not.
How about this? Instead of trying to micromanage urban hens, why doesn't Salem just go back to the status quo ante of 1970? There was no ban on hens then, and I can't find a single person who recalls a problem.
UPDATE: Here are the key items in the staff recommendation:
Staff's Recommendation – Staff has revised our original proposal somewhat. Here's what it currently says:
1. No roostersObviously 3 and 4 are the killers that basically make urban hens only possible for suburban sprawl development areas. The core of Salem, where chickens were allowed without incident until the 1970s, would be excluded.
2. Up to three hens allowed
3. Minimum lot size 10,000 square feet
4. Coops must be 20' away from any property line
5. Chickens must remain in an enclosure at all times (your yard is not an enclosure)
6. Chickens allowed as a special use in single family residential zones
7. Chickens must be maintained in a sanitary condition
Monday, May 11, 2009
Great news! Public Hearing On Allowing Urban Hens in Salem May 26!
This is it! Come one, come all! If you have any interest whatsoever in sustainability, local food, home economy, better gardening, and relocalization, please attend --- and, if you live in Salem, plan to testify in support of Chickens in the Yard (CITY).
New books of note at Tea Party Bookshop
Gaia's Garden - Revised Edition - A Guide to Home Scale Permaculture - very well done, beautiful illustrations
A Nation of Farmers - Sharon Astyk - written by the same lady who wrote Depletion & Abundance. How growing food, raising chickens, etc. can overthrow industrial agriculture
Presidential Energy Policy - Michael Ruppert - author of Crossing the Rubicon, heard recently on KBOO. More on the end of oil, from a political/economic/military perspective
End of Money & the Future of Civilization - Thomas Greco - more on the economy and how to re-humanize it.
And some more practical books as well, home energy efficiency, cooking green, gardening.
Excellence in Punditry award for week of May 11, 2009
We've digested the so-called "stress tests" for now with nary a burp and in a few weeks General Motors will step into the dark cave of bankruptcy. All the ancillary businesses linked to the US car-makers face contraction and annihilation. A couple of things occur to me which have not even entered the national debate on these matters:1.) the US will still need to manufacture engines and chassis for military vehicles. Do we intend to send out to Mitsubishi for those things in the years ahead?2.) the US will need rolling stock (i.e. choo-choo cars and engines) for a revived passenger railroad system. Do we intend to buy all that from the quaint peoples of other lands? (While the US workforce instead focuses on updated releases of Grand Theft Auto.)At the moment, there is tremendous hoopla and jubilation over the start-up of so many "shovel-ready" highway projects around America -- as if what we need most are additional circumferential freeways to enhance the Happy Motoring lifestyle. How insane are we? Is this the only thing we know how to do?
Sunday, May 10, 2009
Once more into the breach! CITY @ City Hall this Monday!
Urgent - Please attend City Council
City Hall, 555 Liberty St SE, Rm 240
(Room 240 extends over the parking lot)
Let’s fill the City Council Chambers with C.I.T.Y. supporters!
C.I.T.Y. and other supporters of hens in Salem will be giving presentations. Supporters of this cause will be asked to stand and we want to show City Council that our support is growing and we are stronger and more determined than ever!
Bring your family, friends, neighbors, co-workers . . . anyone you know who supports our cause. We're on the City Council agenda, so we need a good showing to remind City Council that there are plenty of voters who want the opportunity to keep a few hens for eggs and as pets.
Friday, May 8, 2009
Unsolicited Plug 3 -- the most delicious one yet
The wonderful WVFCo. not-yet-baked frozen pies are also available at the Fresh Start Market on Center St, which gives you an outstanding way to support a worthwhile effort and get your pie jones satisfied too.
But no matter where you get them, they make a dessert that is out of this world.