Wednesday, August 20, 2014

WORD -- Different rules apply

A most important article. As true in Salem as everyplace else.

http://www.rogerebert.com/mzs/what-white-privilege-really-means-an-anecdote


"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Cohen has been drinking fracking fluids again


Serious insanity by NYT's Cohen. Anyone who says USA is heading towards energy self sufficiency is either themselves innumerate, a con man, or way too trusting of those who are.

The magnetism of Silicon Valley may suggest that the United States, a young nation still, is Rome at the height of its power. American soft power is alive and well. America's capacity for reinvention, its looming self-sufficiency in energy, its good demographics and, not least, its hold on the world's imagination, all suggest vigor.

The Nation's editor has Washington Post column on fair representation voting for Congress

This is the uber-reform, the one that unlocks all the other reforms we need.

"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."



We need a fairer system for choosing House members

By Katrina vanden Heuvel  August 19 at 8:48 AM

In the original conception of our Constitution, the House of Representatives was to be the branch of government that best reflected the will of the people. House members cannot serve without being elected — vacancies are not filled by appointees — and they must face the voters every two years. Notably, the House holds pride of place as the first branch of government to be described in the Constitution. The framers move directly from "We the People" to the House, underlining the notion that, for our Constitution (and our government) to function, representatives must be accountable to the people.

Unfortunately, as we near the 2014 midterm elections, the reality of House races today clashes with that goal.

Let's start with the connection between votes and seats. In 2012, we faced a major choice between the major parties and a mandate on President Obama's first term. In the presidential race, Obama defeated Mitt Romney in the national popular vote by almost three percentage points, and Republicans suffered the worst performance in Senate elections by any major party in a half-century.

In House races, Democratic nominees overcame incumbent advantages for Republicans and won the national popular vote by more than 1.1 million votes. By those numbers, Americans painted the Capitol royal blue. Shockingly, though, Republicans won 54 percent of the House seats,establishing for themselves a 33-seat majority. And looking ahead, analysts estimate that Democrats may need as much as 55 percent of the popular vote in November to secure a majority.

Such a disconnect between voters and those who are installed as their congressional leaders goes far beyond any distortion we've seen in the Electoral College in presidential elections. It's absolutely unacceptable in House elections, and it deserves far more debate than it has received.

The most-discussed culprit for the abysmal nature of House elections is gerrymandering. Every decade, states redraw congressional districts. Given the sophistication of today's technology, the growing partisan divide among voters and the relatively low-profile nature of the process, those in charge of mapping have the means, motive and opportunity to use redistricting to help their friends and hurt their enemies. Republicans in states such as Florida, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia did just that. Barack Obama carried all those states in 2008, but today, Republicans hold a 68-31 edge in those states' House seats.

But while gerrymandering matters, we must think more broadly. The core problem turns out to be districting, not redistricting. Congress's 1967 law that mandates use of single-member districts for House elections has institutionalized the practice of shoehorning voters into boxes that restrict choices and distort representation. That is, districts are drawn in ways that lead to results predetermined by the powers that be. But today, there's a growing call, from members of Congress including James Clyburn (D-S.C.)to institutions such as the The Washington Post editorial board, to consider allowing voters to define their own representation in multi-seat district elections.

FairVote has created just such a fair-representation plan that Congress has full authority to establish. Every state would keep its same number of seats, but districts would be combined into larger districts drawn by independent commissions. Of critical importance: In each new "superdistrict," like-minded voters could elect candidates of choice in proportion to their share of the vote. To illustrate: In this "open-ticket system," a voter would cast a vote for one candidate. This vote counts for the candidate and, if that candidate is associated with a political party, also for that party. Seats are then allocated to parties in proportion to their share of the vote using a proportional-representation formula — like that used by Democrats to allocate convention delegates in their presidential primaries. Each party's share of seats is filled by its candidates who won the most votes. An independent wins by exceeding the minimum share of votes necessary to win. (Watch FairVote's excellent video for a primer on the system.)

In Massachusetts, for example, more than a third of the state's voters consistently vote Republican, but the GOP has not won a House seat there in two decades. Yet by consolidating Massachusetts's nine districts into three districts of three seats each, and by using a fair-representation system, that significant bloc of Republican votes would consistently win three — rather than zero — of Massachusetts's nine seats, a direct translation of the voters' will. Similarly, Democrats could end Republican monopolies and exaggerated majorities in states such as Kansas, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania and Texas.

Although novel, fair representation has the potential to draw a strong coalition of support. Women, for example, are deeply underrepresented in House elections, with more than four in five seats still held by men, andwomen win about 10 percent more seats in multi-seat state-legislative and city-council elections than they do in congressional districts. Other supporters would be those in favor of 50-state parties, as we would engender two-party competition in every corner of the nation. Third parties would be able to field viable candidates, not mere spoilers, and our ideological polarization would be lessened with a new mix of representatives that better reflects the diversity of our thoughts and interests.

How we can move such a bold plan forward? To start, Democrats who are crafting a redistricting reform package should enable commissions to create such plans. State leaders should petition Congress for an exemption from the 1967 mandate. Maryland state Sen. Jamie Raskin (D) has proposed that two states that have done partisan gerrymanders — one for Democrats and one for Republicans — could even enter into an interstate compact in which they agree to utilize a fair-representation plan together.

We may have an opportunity this year. In July, Florida's congressional gerrymander was tossed out by a state judge on the grounds that two districts did not comply with the state's Fair District constitutional amendments, which had been approved by voters in 2010. A FairVote proposal has shown how, in a fair-representation system, the five Florida districts affected by the ruling could be combined into a single district, its representatives chosen by the open-ticket rule. It would make every voter count, provide fairer partisan representation and uphold the Voting Rights Act.

People are thinking creatively about how to re-energize American democracy. It is not acceptable to sit on our hands as we watch the value of a vote get more and more skewed. It's time to launch a drive for a fair-representation system for Congress so that the House of "We the People" can finally live up to its name.

Read more from Katrina vanden Heuvel's archive or follow her on Twitter.

Petition: when the student dies, the student loans should too

Even on loans with a co-signer

https://www.change.org/petitions/please-forgive-private-student-loans-when-the-primary-borrower-dies

"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

Monday, August 18, 2014

Sad but true: Status Anxiety Drives Trains, Shuns Buses

I have heard young people refer to buses as the "loser cruiser."  In theory, mature adults would have outgrown this sort of juvenile status anxiety.  In practice, not so much.


Status Anxiety Drives Trains, Shuns Buses
// Next City Daily

"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

Sunday, August 17, 2014

Great reminder: the power of refusing to go away

One of my net friends has a great post for citizen activism today, 

"Stay Calm and Go to the Top of the Foodchain"

She ends with this great reminder

Fellow Citizens, we're not crazy and we're not stupid.  There's always something we can do to disrupt the patterns of secrecy that create an unhealthy balance of power, especially now that we can network through social media.  When you get that yucky feeling in the pit of your stomach about what's going on, dig in your heals and refuse to go away.   Because that's what they count on.   Not because our public officials and administrators are bad people.  They're just like the rest of us, always slightly over-whelmed and trying their best to do some very complicated jobs – so, of course, it would be easier for them if we Citizens would trust their judgement and not worry our pretty little heads about these complicated political issues.  

Ask questions.  Get angry.  Pick up a pen.  Talk to each other.  We are powerful, Citizens, and nobody is more important.

Here's her full post:

Stay Calm and Go to the Top of the Foodchain

Anger can be a very productive emotion if you learn how to use it properly.  But it requires a conscious effort.  Let's take a look at my most recent bout when I was being given the run-around by the Port Authority regarding Western & Southern's equity participation in Queen City Square.  (See the blog post, Now I'm Pi$$ed)

1.  Their Associate Counsel sent me a 63-page document that did not answer my question and told me to hire a lawyer to read it for me.

2.  Since I had copied the specific employee who negotiated the original deal for the city on my request, this was very frustrating and I did not feel they were making a good-faith effort to supply the information. Grrrrrrrrr. The implication that I was too stupid to understand a legal contract did not help my mood and I started using terms like "that little pip squeak." Double grrrrrrrr.  "Stupid" is the worst thing anybody can imply since I try very hard to do more homework than anybody else in any room.  My poor husband – who really doesn't understand why I don't just mind my own business – had to pretend like he was listening to a lot of complicated real estate jargon that doesn't directly impact his life.  

3.  Then I slept on it.

4.  And when I woke up this morning, I wasn't mad anymore and knew from the bottom of my heart that I was not a powerless, little insect that the Port Authority could flick-off at will, a mere annoyance on a list of much more important considerations.  I am a Citizen and there's nothing more important.

Still in my nightgown, I created a multi-pronged plan to march towards change.  And the change I'm looking for is increased transparency, a better educated electorate, and more meaningful community conversation.  None of it requires casts of thousands or any money.  It is a commitment of time, will, and faith in the intelligent goodness of my fellow citizens.  I believe in us.

The first item on my action-list was to go back to the Port Authority and ask for the intervention of the woman who runs the show, Executive Director, Laura Brunner.  

Hello, Laura.  Christopher Recht has been very responsive in my recent requests for public documents regarding the Queen City Square project.  But we seem to have reached an impasse on the question of any retained equity ownership of the building by Western & Southern Life Insurance or any of their affiliates.  Since the building is currently on the market two years after completion and the Lessee can terminate the lease on or after October 1, 2015 this is important for the citizens of Cincinnati to understand. 

Christopher's first response to my query was a one-page summation of the project financing and it clearly included no discussion of division of proceeds should the building be sold. When I told him that this was not the information I needed he sent the 63 page Lease Agreement and suggested I consult an attorney for interpretation of the document.  
 
I have seen a 15% percent retained ownership mentioned in other sources, so I am puzzled as to why I don't see any reference to such an arrangement in documents provided by the Port Authority.  Susan Thomas negotiated the terms of the project for the City and I was hoping this would be a fairly simple question for her to answer.
 
As Christopher implied in his most recent email, perhaps I don't have sufficient expertise to read and understand legal contracts without going to the expense of paying an attorney. But if that is the case, then I would suggest we need a uniform executive summary of the most important financial facts regarding each of the Port Authority's projects that is accessible on your website.  I'm sure this improvement in communication would save a lot of valuable time for your staff in responding to inquiries such as mine.  Currently there is no standardization and the information on Queen City Square appears to have been written by a public relations professional, seriously lacking in financial detail. Your biggest project to date by ten-fold, it deserves far greater transparency and I would be happy to volunteer my time to help the Port Authority develop a standardized format for use by elected public officials, citizens, the press, and commission members.
 
In the meantime, I would very much appreciate it if Christopher could supply me with a reference to the particular section and page numbers in the Lease Agreement that pertain to division of proceeds on sale of Queen City Square.  If my other source is wrong in regard to equity participation, that would also end our conversation and I could feel comfortable in my understanding of the relationship of the city to this project, but I would like somebody to say it out loud. 
 
Thank-you for your help,
Kathy Holwadel

  

Fellow Citizens, we're not crazy and we're not stupid.  There's always something we can do to disrupt the patterns of secrecy that create an unhealthy balance of power, especially now that we can network through social media.  When you get that yucky feeling in the pit of your stomach about what's going on, dig in your heals and refuse to go away.   Because that's what they count on.   Not because our public officials and administrators are bad people.  They're just like the rest of us, always slightly over-whelmed and trying their best to do some very complicated jobs – so, of course, it would be easier for them if we Citizens would trust their judgement and not worry our pretty little heads about these complicated political issues.  

Ask questions.  Get angry.  Pick up a pen.  Talk to each other.  We are powerful, Citizens, and nobody is more important.

Thursday, August 14, 2014

Free Dental Clinics Attract Thousands of Volunteers & Millions of Patients

Free Dental Clinics Attract Thousands of Volunteers & Millions of Patients - NPQ - Nonprofit Quarterly
Here's another idea for the Salem 

"Billion Better Ways to Spend a Billion Bucks (than on an unnecessary Third Bridge)" list 

-- a year-round, sliding scale public dental health clinic.  

We could put it at the North Salem Hospital parcel in a repurposed structure, part of saving all those structures and turning them into productive uses, such as housing and medical clinics for people struggling to keep sheltered and fed.  Turn the unbuilt land into an urban farm food and skills growing project.

Free Dental Clinics Attract Thousands of Volunteers & Millions of Patients

Free dental services
spirit of america / Shutterstock.com

August 8, 2014; Charlotte Observer

In a 2012 report, "Dental Therapists: Expanding Care to Every Community," the Kellogg Foundation reported that "roughly 83 million Americans face barriers to dental care." Dental care is critically important to people's health and well-being but it is often either priced out of sight or just not accessible so not only are community health centers offering the services more often but also free health clinics are popping up across the United States – as here in the Carolinas


...

Mission of Mercy also offers free clinics in many other states including Oregon where at dawn on July 14th, there were already about 300 people lined up, some having waited for 24 hours. The first two in line were Kory Brown who needed a root canal and his wife Leslie Bowers who was hoping for a removable partial denture, to replace a dead tooth.

According to the same Kellogg report there are good financial reasons why access to dental care should be a priority issue. "In 2006, Americans made more than 330,000 trips to hospital emergency rooms primarily due to tooth pain or other preventable dental problems. These ER visits cost nearly $110 million.For states, the financial penalty is severe. A study of Medicaid enrollees found that in-patient ER treatment for dental problems cost nearly 10 times more per patient than preventive care in a dentist's office."


"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

Perovskite solar

http://www.samefacts.com/2014/08/woolgathering/perovskite-solar/

"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

Good buzz: Urban bees to the rescue?

"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

>
> http://www.mprnews.org/story/2014/08/13/rooftop-bees