Saturday, October 11, 2014

Cylvia Hayes: John Kitzhaber wounded, but probably will win | OregonLive.com [feedly]

The one thing that can be said positive about Cylvia's world-class stupid in 1997, and her galactic-class stupidity in not disclosing it herself before becoming serious with Kitz is this:

Isn't it a refreshing to see someone's criminal blunder be motivated by a charitable impulse -- the desire to help another flesh and blood person out -- for a change?  

Sure she got paid a bit ($5k) but there's no way she would have done it if it wasn't a crime that appeared to have no victim anywhere. The primary motivation was clearly helping someone out of a real jam.

There will be lots of attack dogs snarling around her to try to take a bite out of her fiancé, but nearly every one will be people who are all too happy to make excuses for crimes committed in the name of greed by the likes of corporations and rich crooks like the Koch brothers.

She needs to break the engagement and withdraw from any public contracts, and figure out how to atone for her criminal conduct. But trying to slam Kitz for her stupidity is going too far by a mile.

----
Cylvia Hayes: John Kitzhaber wounded, but probably will win | OregonLive.com
http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2014/10/cylvia_hayes_john_kitzhaber_wo.html
----
Shared via my feedly reader


"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

All you need to know about the Big Zero

So, faced with a candidate they themselves declare unelectable vs. an incumbent they admit is competent and who suitably represents the people who elected him, the Oregonian refuses to make the only endorsement possible in such a match.

Their ideal is more Ron Wyden, the third senator from New York, who almost single handedly nearly torpedoed health care reform, loves cutting estate taxes (like on his rich wife's family), and supports lower labor and environmental standards that help send Oregon jobs overseas.

Senator Jeff Merkley not only towers above Wehby in stature and effectiveness, but above Wyden as well.  The best thing that could happen for Oregon is for Peter Defazio to take Wyden's place next time the seat is up or if Wyden decides to admit that he no longer has any connection to Oregon.  Meekly and Defazio would be a terrific team for Oregon in the Senate.

Then, of course, there was Wehby's aversion (until very recently) to debating Merkley, which many voters have probably interpreted as an admission of incompetence. Chunks of her policy material also turned out to be plagiarized, further eroding the credibility of a campaign seemingly built on the assumption that serving in the Senate ain't brain surgery.  In the end, questions about Wehby's suitability for elective office loom so large that her views on policy hardly matter. She's unelectable.

That's a shame. There's no question that Merkley's competent. His weakness, rather, is his highly partisan record. If Merkley had patterned himself after fellow Democrat Ron Wyden, we'd be happy to endorse him. Instead, he quickly became known as one of the Senate's most left-leaning members. For instance, while Wyden in 2011 supported free trade agreements with South Korea, Panama and Columbia – not surprising given Oregon's dependence upon trade – Merkley opposed them.


----
Merkley, Wehby both unsupportable: Editorial endorsement
http://read.feedly.com/html?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.oregonlive.com%2Fopinion%2Findex.ssf%2F2014%2F10%2Fmerkley_wehby_both_unsupportab.html&theme=white&size=medium
----
Shared via my feedly reader


"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

Do these sound like crimes?

"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

>
> From The Nation:
> Mental Illness, Homelessness, Drug Addiction: Do These Sound Like Crimes?
> Mychal Denzel Smith on October 9, 2014 - 9:00AM ET
>
>
> Kajieme Powell told the St. Louis police to shoot him. He told them repeatedly to shoot him, and the two police officers who were called to the scene quickly obliged. But they didn't shoot him because he told them to. The official reason St. Louis Police Chief Sam Dotson gave for why the officers shot Powell—which they did at least nine times, including several shots fired after Powell had already fallen to the ground—was that Powell was carrying a knife and charged toward the two officers holding that knife with an overhand grip.
>
> Cellphone video captured by a witness standing nearby throws this official account of events into question, including the overhand grip, whether Powell "charged" at the officers and even the distance Powell was from the officers. But what does seem clear is that Powell was not well. In the video, he paces back and forth outside the store speaking incoherently, the two stolen energy drinks sitting on the sidewalk. The first thing he says that makes any sense is when the police arrive and he yells, "Shoot me!" The police do nothing to de-escalate the situation, hopping out of their car with guns drawn. Perhaps this is protocol, but at no point, after recognizing that Powell is only holding a knife and is not threatening the lives of anyone around him, do they attempt any non-lethal means of subduing him. They do not recognize his barking "Shoot me! Kill me now!" as suicidal. They ended the ordeal, and Powell's life, without much consideration of any alternatives.
>
> But this is to be expected when far too many police officers aren't being trained to handle suspects with mental illness, but are increasingly called to do so. As mental-health services disappear across the country, it is the police departments, the court system and the prisons that, more and more, are charged with care for those with mental illnesses. But that care often takes the form of what happened in St. Louis to Powell, or of incarceration without treatment.
>
> This is true for a number of social problems that America would rather not deal with. It's a system that's not only unsustainable, financially and morally, but does little to ameliorate these issues. Fortunately, there are alternatives, and in the absence of any national policy shift, America's cities have been on the front lines of implementing new and better programs that get people the help they need without sending them through the criminal justice system. Still, more can be done.
>
> At any given moment in the United States, there are some 2.3 million people who are incarcerated. This country has the highest rate of incarceration in the world. And this persists even as the crime rate has dropped. The main driver of the explosion in prison population (in the 1970s it was somewhere around 300,000—a number prison activists said was too high even then) has been the War on Drugs, which in addition to locking more people up for nonviolent offenses, has led to mandatory minimums and longer prison sentences across the board. While we may lag behind in math and science, we lead the world in innovating new ways to maintain our prison system.
>
> Last year, Brave New Films, the ACLU and The Nation teamed up to bring you a video series about the corporations and industries profiting off our massive prison population. In her introductory essay, Liliana Segura wrote that "when corporations seek to profit from prisons, it creates a powerful financial incentive, not just to push for policies that fuel mass incarceration but to cut corners in the services they've been hired to provide."
>
> This year, we're launching a new video series, OverCriminalized, that focuses on the people who find themselves being trafficked through this nation's prisons and police precincts with little regard for their humanity and zero prospects for actual justice. They are victims of an unwillingness to invest in solving major social problems, and the consequent handing off of that responsibility to the police, the courts and the prisons. They are the mentally ill, the homeless and the drug addicted. Sometimes they are all three.
>
> Instead of treatment, those living with severe mental illness are often subject to arrest and police violence. It's estimated that half of the people shot and killed by a police officer have some type of mental-health problem. James Boyd was killed in Albuquerque, New Mexico after a five-hour negotiation with police, who were trying to get the homeless man to leave an illegal campsite he had set up. Boyd only had two small camping knives, but he was shot in the back after the officers set off a stun grenade
>
> When they aren't killing people with mental-health issues, the police are arresting them, a harrowing and harmful experience in its own right. "Jails are the number-one mental-health facilities across the country," San Antonio Police Officer Joe Smarro explains in this video series. And that's no surprise, considering that from 2009 to 2012, $4.35 billion in public mental health spending was cut from state budgets. According to Leon Evans, president of the Center for Health Care Services in San Antonio, nonviolent mentally ill persons are on average incarcerated for three to four times longer than violent offenders without mental illness. And the type of treatment they receive when they are imprisoned is no less violent than what they experience on the street.
>
> A four-month investigation by The New York Times found that brutal attacks on inmates, especially those with mental-health issues, are routine at the nation's second-largest prison facility, Rikers Island. They found that over an eleven-month period in 2013, there were 129 incidents where inmates suffered "serious injuries" caused by jail employees, and that 77 percent of those who experienced "fractures, wounds requiring stitches, head injuries" had also been diagnosed with a mental illness. According to the Times, "Rikers now has about as many people with mental illnesses—roughly 4,000 of the 11,000 inmates—as all 24 psychiatric hospitals in New York State combined. They make up nearly 40 percent of the jail population, up from about 20 percent eight years ago."
>
> At the same time mental illness is being criminalized, so too is a related public health problem: drug abuse. The War on Drugs was sold to the American people as targeting drug kingpins, but in actuality it has resulted in the arrest and incarceration of mostly low-level dealers and addicts. The criminalization of drug use has also disproportionately affected black people. An ACLU report from 2013 found that, even with similar rates of usage, black people are 3.7 times more likely to be arrested for marijuana possession. The report also said: "The findings show that while there were pronounced racial disparities in marijuana arrests 10 years ago, they have grown significantly worse. In counties with the worst disparities, Blacks were as much as 30 times more likely to be arrested. The racial disparities exist in all regions of the U.S., as well as in both large and small counties, cities and rural areas, and in both high- and low-income communities. Disparities are also consistently high whether Blacks make up a small or a large percentage of a county's overall population."
>
> Ultimately, we are locking people up for either recreational drug use that is harming no one, or for self-medicating an undiagnosed mental illness. In the same way people become addicted to drugs, we have become addicted to using incarceration to treat problems without addressing the underlying causes.
>
> The same holds true for homelessness. In New York City, arrests of peddlers and panhandlers—crimes associated with homelessness—are triple what they were only a year ago. Earlier this year, the NYPD came under fire for raiding a homeless shelter, Freedom House, and arresting twenty-two people. In Fort Lauderdale, Florida, city commissioners recently passed an ordinance that prohibits "camping"—or sleeping outside—and carries with it the potential penalty of a $500 fine and sixty days in jail.
>
> There is a longstanding history in this country of imprisoning the most vulnerable populations. The criminalizing of homelessness harkens back to the days of post-Reconstruction, when vagrancy laws that had not been enforced for decades were suddenly being applied to the newly freed black populations. The "black codes" targeted the formerly enslaved and arrested them for violations such as not being able to produce paperwork showing employment. The result was their being arrested and shuffled off to prisons that had sprung up on former plantations, effectively re-enslaving them.
>
> This legacy has continued in our era through broken windows policing, stop-and-frisk policies and discriminatory immigration enforcement measures such as Secure Communities. All of these have the potential to criminalize everyday behaviors (often based on race) and maintain police officers' role as the preferred tool to address too many of society's problems.
>
> What the homeless need is housing, first and foremost, and prison is not an adequate substitute. "So many major social problems come to the criminal-justice system to be fixed because there isn't something else out there. But don't ask the criminal justice system to do it all, because the only thing we really know how to do is send people to prison," prosecutor Dan Satterberg told our film crew.
>
> That's why this video series is not just about presenting the problem, but about how you can take action. The criminal-justice system is racist and corrupt. Mass incarceration creates more problems than it solves. Prisons are more violent and expensive than the alternatives. The entire system is less humane that it should be.
>
> These videos focus on solutions that are not only cost effective but actually work in bettering people's lives and making us less dependent on prisons. These programs could certainly go further, by more effectively keeping these social problems out of the criminal-justice system. But they go a long way toward rethinking the efficacy of treating homelessness, drug addiction and mental illness as nails that can be hammered down simply with more arrests.
>
> Take Action: Call on Congress to Support Critical Mental Health Services
>
> These approaches save money and save lives. But implementing them in more of our communities will take a concerted political effort. As a first step, you can sign this petition calling on Congress to pass the Strengthening Mental Health in Our Communities Act. A better way is not only possible, it's necessary

Friday, October 10, 2014

Register Now for Nov 15 HCAO Statewide Strategy Meeting in Salem

"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."


Let's Get to Work Building A Movement to Win

Health Care for All Oregon member organization's and local action group's delegates, individual members and other supporters will gather Saturday, November 15, in Salem, to celebrate victories, plan strategies and strengthen our movement to create universal health care in Oregon.

We will be rolling up our sleeves to do the hard work to reach victory. Included in the day's agenda will be an update on the HCAO Strategic Plan, a report on progress on our 2015 legislation, a discussion of the post-election political environment and a lobby training focused on our upcoming Health Care for ALL Oregon Rally, February 11, 2015 at the State Capitol.

Register here to attend the HCAO Statewide Strategy Meeting

HCAO Statewide Strategy Meeting

Saturday, November 15, 2014

10:30 am to 3:30 pm (Registration at 10:00 am)

First Congregational Church of Christ, 700 Marion St NE, Salem

Lunch will be provided (donations are encouraged)

HCAO now has 98 member organizations and over 13,000 supporters in our database. Local action groups statewide are working week in and week out to educate voters. Twice a year representatives of all our groups gather to strategize, hone our skills and build our momentum and enthusiasm.

Be there prepared to get to work on building a movement to win!

Register here to attend the HCAO Statewide Strategy Meeting


Undernews: Bookshelf: The medicalization of aging and what to do about it (#PFD)

Undernews: Bookshelf: The medicalization of aging and what to do about it

Bookshelf: The medicalization of aging and what to do about it

Michael Mechanic, Mother Jones - The latest book from surgeon and best-selling author Atul Gawande may not change your whole life, but it could very well improve how it ends.

In Being Mortal, Gawande, a longtime staff writer for the New Yorker, takes on the utter failure of the medical profession when it comes to helping people die well, and the short-sightedness of the elder facilities that infantilize people rather than bother to figure out what they actually need to maintain a modicum of meaning in what's left of their lives. In the process, he gives us a lesson on the basic physiology of aging and on the social and technological changes that led to most of us dying in hospitals and institutions rather than at home with our loved ones. And he chronicles the rise of the nursing home and the creation of assisted living as its antidote—if only it were.

The picture can seem pretty bleak. Many of Gawande's subjects are dealing with the always-hopeful oncologists who, rather than accept the inevitable, coax their patients into trying futile fourth-line chemotherapies that nobody can pronounce. And then you've got hospitals axing their geriatrics departments (aging Boomers be damned) because Medicare won't cover the extra costs of making someone's last years worth living. There's also a deeply personal aspect to the book, which goes on sale today. Gawande recounts the recent travails of his family, which began when his father, also a surgeon, was diagnosed with a cancer that would slowly eat away at his physical capabilities and ultimately end his life.

But Being Mortal is hopeful, too, and that's why it could make a difference. Most of the changes we need to make aren't expensive. Indeed, some of them could save us a bundle in cash and needless suffering. It turns out, for example, that terminal patients in hospice programs often live longer and better than their counterparts in treatment. In fact, the mere act of talking with caregivers about what you value as you near the end of your life leads to a longer one.

Interview with Gawande


"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

YES on 92! Help keep our ads on the air! | Oregon Right to Know

https://oregonrighttoknow.ngpvanhost.com/form/-8839432081458788608?ms=E.FR-O-AD4.ND.OR.MAIN_CONTRIBUTE-DONATE&AM=35


"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

Great Stuff: Fill Your Pantry, Buy Some Extra for Marion-Polk Food Share

"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

Hey folks --

 

Here's a great way to stock your pantry for the winter while supporting local farms! Check out the Fill Your Pantry events in Shedd, Oregon and Corvallis.


 

The Shedd event:

http://www.greenwillowgrains.com/33-fill-your-pantry-2014


The Corvallis Event:

 

















FRIENDS OF THE SALEM PUBLIC LIBRARY

FALL BOOK SALE
OCTOBER 16 - 19

Special Sale Location
1555 12TH ST SE, SALEM
FREE PARKING

Friends Night – October 16th from 4 pm-8:30 pm
(Memberships offered at the door, new members welcome!)

Friday October 17th & Saturday October 18th 10:00 am – 5:30 pm
Sunday October 19th 1 pm – 5 pm $4/Bag Day all Sunday

Paperbacks $0.75  
Hardbacks $1.25
Fall Sale only blow-out price for Children’s & Teens .50 each
Audio Visual $0.50 – $1.00

CASH, CHECKS & CARD
SPECIALTY & COLLECTIBLE books at marked prices

For More information:  503-362-1755 
SPLFriends@Peak.org  or  www.salemfriends.org

See you at the Sale!

Thursday, October 9, 2014

NO on 90!: Don't Let Big Business Limit your Voice



"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."

Dear friends,
The big corporate interests backing Measure 90 are saying all sorts of things about how Measure 90 will give Oregonians more choices, expand voter participation, and improve our democracy.
But… here's the thing.  

Measure 90 does the exact opposite.
 
We don't need to guess at what Measure 90 "Top Two" election changes will do. We can look to our California neighbors and learn the real truth about how "Top Two" election changes limit our choice, our vote, and our voice.

1.      "Top Two" election forces a choice that's not really a choice. In "Top Two" states California and Washington, 25% of November races are now between candidates from just one major political party. Forcing a Democrat to choose between two Republican candidates is no choice at all.


2.       Voters participate less under "Top Two" systems. Under the "Top Two" system in California, researchers found that voters participate at a lower rate – because they didn't have a candidate to vote for that aligned with their values. A recent report showed that nearly 1 in 10 voters skip elections between members of the same party.
3.      Primary Voters choose for the majority of us. Primary voters – who tend to be older, whiter, more partisan, and wealthier – have control over who appears on our November ballot, limiting the choices for the rest of us.

Learn more: www.NoOnMeasure90.org
Protect Our Choice: Say NO to 90

The goal of Measure 90 is to limit Oregonians' choice, vote, and voice. It's no wonder that the broadest and most diverse coalition has come together to fight it – including teachers, nurses, firefighters, police officers, representatives from major and minor parties, faith leaders, and small businesses.

Join us in voting NO on 90: www.NoOnMeasure90.org/Join-Us

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

NO ON 90! Enron Alum Puts $1.5 Million Into M 90

I spent a beautiful Indian-summer Saturday in Eugene last week, trapped in an airless room in the law school with some really scary people, the folks pushing Measure 90, the measure to privatize and close elections to all but the top-two corporate approved primary finishers. 

I remarked to a friend that these M90 campaigners gave me the exact same creepy buzz as Scientologists, all absolute certainty about their solution but remarkable vagueness about what the heck that so-called solution has to do with any real world problems.

It is absolutely fitting that the lavishly overfunded yes campaign has filled the Voter's Pamphlet with arguments in the OPPOSED section but that are actually just more filibustering yes arguments.  For this reason alone your vote on M90 should be a resounding no.  The yes campaign conduct is despicable -- although, it does fit perfectly with their approach to elections as a whole:  "We've got all the money, who gives a flying fig about democracy and your right to be heard.  If you had anything worth saying, you'd have money."

This sleeper measure is the most undemocratic idea since the reign of terror in the South under Jim Crow.

"Let's live on the planet as if we intend to stay."


Former Top Enron Energy Trader Funds 69% of Measure 90 Campaign (top two primary)

FOR RELEASE:  10/8/2014  
Manipulating energy markets was not enough.  Now the agenda is manipulating Oregon's elections.

The
campaign to impose "top two primaries" on Oregon has revealed its true logo -- Enron.  Haven't Enron energy traders done Oregon enough harm?

 
Former top-level Enron energy trader John Arnold has now contributed $1,500,000 to a new political committee, the "Open Primaries Committee."  The Committee's only mission is to support Measure 90, the "top two" primary plan backed by corporations and the wealthy.


PRESS RELEASE BY:

John Arnold made his mark on society as one of the top managers of the Enron energy trading operation.  That was the bunch who caused the phony "West Coast Energy Crisis" of 2000-2002 with fraudulent trades, resulting in rolling blackouts and huge electricity rate increases.  Later studies showed that it cost the California economy alone over $42 billion.  See http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/report/r_103cwr.pdf.  For its impact on Oregon, see http://www.trojandown.org/enron.pdf
John Arnold is Measure 90's biggest financial backer, by far.  Of the total raised to support Measure 90 between its two committees ($2,189,719 so far), John Arnold personally has contributed 69% of it.

For information on the new committee, see https://secure.sos.state.or.us/orestar/sooDetail.do?sooRsn=76334.  Information on the other pro-Measure 90 committee is here: https://secure.sos.state.or.us/orestar/sooDetail.do?sooRsn=76016

"Burn, baby, burn.  That's a beautiful thing."  That is what Enron traders were recorded as saying as a fire approached a major transmission line, because it caused the line to be "derated" or shut off, thus drastically increasing electricity prices.  See this New York Times article" Word for Word?Energy Hogs: Enron Traders on Grandama Millie and Making Out Like Bandits for more information.  Or remember this from the Enron energy traders:
"They're f------g taking all the money back from you guys?" complains an Enron employee on the tapes. "All the money you guys stole from those poor grandmothers in California?"

"Yeah, grandma Millie, man"

"Yeah, now she wants her f------g money back for all the power you've charged right up, jammed right up her ass for f------g $250 a megawatt hour."
See the CBS News article Enron Traders Caught on Tape.

John Arnold received a $8 million bonus in 2001, one day before Enron declared bankruptcy.  In his 2005 deposition, he took the 5th Amendment and refused to answer any questions, except basically his name.  He formed a hedge fund, Centaurus Advisors LLC, and hired, among others, John Forney, who had pled guilty to manipulating electricity prices from Enron's now-defunct trading office in Portland, Oregon.  See the CBS News piece Enron Energy Trader Pleads Guilty.

For more information on why Measure 90 is bad for Oregon (but somehow apparently good for former Enron energy traders) see :
Save Oregon's Democracy
Protect Our Vote
Contacts:

Dan Meek
for Oregon Progressive Party

press@meek.net

503-293-9021

Blair Bobier
for Pacific Green Party

blairbobier@hotmail.com

503-559-6176

Seth Woolley
for Pacific Green Party

seth@swoolley.org

503-953-3943

David Delk
for Alliance for Democracy

davidafd@ymail.com

503-232-5495



Oregon Progressive Party | 320 S.W. Stark | Suite 202 | Portland | Oregon 97204 | USA | info@progparty.org | www.progparty.org

Comm100 Email Marketing