Monday, February 15, 2010

Significant for Salem re: Census

TN State Prison 28TN state prison. Image by Exothermic via Flickr

One of the worst aspects of the War on Americans that is labeled (for PR purposes) as a war on drugs is that it has led to a huge population shift from cities to prisons that are located in (generally) pretty rural areas, where the prisoners are counted as residents for census purposes despite their being unable (in almost every state) to vote.

Thus, a vicious circle of insane drug laws and prison expansion turn into a mutually reinforcing dynamic, where communities that stand to benefit by imprisoning young men from urban areas keep electing politicians who demand ever more draconian sentencing schemes and criminalize even more aspects of life. Prosecutors try to amp up the cycle at every turn, becoming the true kings of the criminal justice system and turning judges into errand boys and bystanders who have no discretion while prosecutors are totally without accountability or balancing incentives.

To add insult to injury, most federal aid programs rely on census data, so in addition to causing over-representation of rural areas where prisons are housed, it diverts federal aid to those communities that is needed even more in the cities where the prisoners come from.

LWV reports that a good first step has been made at the federal level that might help with this problem:
New option for the states on inmates in the Census
The Census Bureau has agreed to release information on prisoner populations to states before they are set to redraw their legislative districts. This would give the states an option in deciding how they count prisoners. Census director Robert Groves made the decision after weeks of discussion with Rep. William Lacy Clay, D-Mo., and with public interest and black groups. They called it an important first step toward shifting federal resources and representation back to urban communities, where they believe the aid is needed the most. To read the complete AP article, click here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

1 comment:

Peter Wagner said...

Actually, the impact of the prison miscount on federal funding is quite small, and the impact on urban areas approaches zero.

Other than block grants to states (which are unaffected because most people in prison do not cross state lines) very few programs are distributed on a strict per-capita basis. Population is often one factor in grants, but it is more often some measure of population tied to the need being addressed, such as the number of children in poverty for a program about supporting poor schools.

But the political effects of counting 2 million people in the wrong place are huge. http://www.prisonersofthecensus.org