Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Why Growing Food Locally is Key

In the coming tough times, food will be key -- and not just any food, but locally raised food from as close as possible, preferably grown right here in the heart of the Willamette Valley with as few industrial inputs as possible -- or else we get industrial commodity "phood" that is:

Less tasty -- and not as good for you

Industrially grown produce shows long-term nutritional decline

Posted by Tom Philpott

Talk to old-timers, and they'll often tell you that the tomatoes you find in supermarket produce sections don't taste anything like the ones they had in their childhoods in the '30s and '40s.

Turns out, they're probably not as nutritious, either.

In an article [PDF] published in the February 2009 issue of the HortScience Review, University of Texas researcher Donald R. Davis compiles evidence that points to declines in nutrition in vegetables and (to a lesser extent) fruits over the past few decades.

For example:

[T]hree recent studies of historical food composition data found apparent median declines of 5% to 40% or more in some minerals in groups of vegetables and perhaps fruits; one study also evaluated vitamins and protein with similar results.

He points to another study in which researchers planted low- and high-yielding varieties of broccoli and grain side-by-side. The high-yielding varieties showed less protein and minerals.

The principle seems to be that when plants are nudged to produce as much as possible -- whether through lots of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides or through selective breeding -- they deliver fewer nutrients. It evidently isn't just the flavor that's become diluted in those bland supermarket tomatoes.

This is a fascinating insight. We should reflect that for at least 50 years, the best-funded agricultural researchers are the ones work to maximize yield -- that is, gross output per acre. Even now, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is expending hundreds of millions of dollars in an effort to increase yields in Africa.

Rather than isolate and fetishize yield, perhaps ag researchers should learn to take a whole-systems approach: study how communities can develop robust food systems that build healthy soil and produce nutritious food.

(It should also be noted that last year the Organic Center compiled peer-reviewed studies finding that organically grown produce tends to deliver significantly higher nutrient levels than conventional.)

3 comments:

Capital Taps said...

Grape growers have perhaps always known this! That's one reason why Pinot Noir growers drop fruit and try to crop around 2 tons per acre. Though they don't cast it in terms of nutritional value, they do understand the implications for flavor - it's as if there's a finite amount of flavor and aroma compounds and they should be maximized and concentrated in each grape. (It's too bad that wine is essentially priced as a luxury good.)

gitron said...

On a somewhat related topic there will be a panel discussion on the benefits and hazards of genetic engineering in agriculture on February 5th at the Salem Public Library from 7-8:30 p.m.

For more information: http://oregonpsr.collaborationtools.org/node/32830

Walker said...

Good catch on reminding folks about the talk on gene tampered food -- or "phood" as I like to call it.

But it's not just the fact that you can't trust the growers any more, it's also that processing adds so much risk that is needless. Just look at the deadly fallout from the peanut butter paste contaminated with salmonella -- what should be a wholesome, simple food that you can easily make yourself at home or make on the spot at a place like LifeSource has instead become a deadly disease vector, all in the name of "cheap phood."

The government agencies are totally defeated and fractured, with no logic or reason behind which agency regulates which foods and which claims about them. The corporations have succeeded fully in capturing their regulators, winning such insane things as laws that prohibit a maker from identifying hazards that people want to know about (such as the "No BST" label fights).